Douglas McGregor presented
the theories of motivation known as Theory X and Theory Y in the 1960s. These
theories are predicated on the idea that in order to complete the task,
management must collect all of the production components, including people.
According to McGregor, management can exploit either of the demands, which are
categorized under theories X and Y, to inspire his workforce (Stoyanov and
Diderich, 2017).
Figure 1: Theory X and Theory Y
(Source: Kurt, 2021)
Figure 1 indicates a person ("X") who refuses to work and a person ("Y") who embraces the opportunity to work
The notable distinction
between Theory X and Theory Y of managers was made by McGregor in 1960.
Managers that adhere to Theory X believe that their employees are uninterested,
will shirk duty, and prefer to get by. According to Theory X, employees need to
be managed and threatened with punishment According to Theory X, managers must
give orders and maintain a close eye on every employee. This is an
authoritarian style of management. As expected, the staff lacks motivation and
despises their jobs (Allio, 2009).
McGregor, on the other hand,
viewed Theory Y managers as those who make the assumptions that employees care
about the company, will take initiative, and will practice restraint. According
to research, the majority of people are capable of being creative and
innovative (Bobic and Davis' 2003). This result supports that Theory Y
assumptions encourage more inclusive decision-making, which ultimately benefits
the company. According to Theory Y, managers should presume that their staff
members are self-driven and motivated to achieve the goals of the company. This
is known as the participative style of management. As a result, management in
this situation aims to produce the most with the fewest possible efforts (Russ,
2011).
The
underlying presumptions of Theory Y are as follows (Stoyanov
and Diderich, 2017):
1.The employee is creative,
self-motivated, and enjoys working with more responsibility, therefore they do
not by nature despise their jobs. The population as a whole, and not just a
small segment of it, has the ability to exercise a relatively high degree of
imagination, originality, and innovation in the solution of organizational
problems.
2. Since employees are self-directed and self-reliant,
the threat of punishment does not always work to achieve the intended outcomes.
3. The benefits connected to an employee's attainment of
goals impact how dedicated they are to them. The ego's satisfaction and the
needs for self-actualization may be the most important rewards in this
situation.
4. The incentives that come with achieving goals
influence how committed people are to them.
According to McGregor, there
are more factors that affect leadership, such as the followers' attitudes and
needs, the form and structure of the organization itself, and the social,
economic, and political environment. For McGregor, leadership was a complicated
interplay between several factors rather than a personal trait. He was one of
the first to make the case that leadership was more than just the traits of the
leader; it also involved the interaction between the leader and the environment
they were in (Theory X and Theory Y, n.d.).
References
Allio, R.J(2009) “Leadership – The Five Big Ideas”, Strategy
& Leadership, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.4-12.
Arslan, A. and Staub, S. (2012). Theory X and Theory Y
Type Leadership Behavior and its Impact on Organizational Performance:
Small Business Owners in the Şishane Lighting and Chandelier
District. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2181347.
Bobic, M.P &Davis, W.E. (2003), “A Kind Word For
Theory X: Or Why So Many Newfangled Management Techniques Quickly Fail” ,
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), pp 239-264.
Kurt, S. (2021). Theory X and Theory Y, Douglas McGregor. (online) Education Library. Available at:< https://educationlibrary.org/theory-x-and-theory-y-douglas-mcgregor/.> (Accessed on 15th November 2022).
Mcgregor, D. (1960). DOUGLAS MCGREGOR: THEORY X AND
THEORY Y. Thinker 026» INTRODUCTION» KEY THEORIES. (online) Available at: https://switcheducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/SEB_LYO_McGregor_Thinker.pdf.
(Accessed on 14th November 2022).
Russ,
T.L.(2011) “Theory X/Y assumptions as predictors of
managers’ propensity for participative decision making”, Management Decision, Vol.
49, No. 5, pp.823-83.
Stoyanov, S. and Diderich, M. (2017). The Human Side
of Enterprise. (online) Google Books. CRC Press. Available at: <https://books.google.lk/books?id=rEkrDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=douglas+mcgregor > (Accessed 22 November 2022).
Theory X and Theory Y. (n.d.). (online) Available at: <https://www.jsscacs.edu.in/sites/default/files/Files/Module-3-%20Theories%20of%20%20Motivation.pdf. >(Accessed on 11th November 2022).
Thank you for your comment Upul. According to Theory Y, labor is as natural as recreation or rest; people are not naturally lazy; rather, they have developed a tendency toward laziness as a result of experience. In order to achieve the goals they are dedicated to, people will practice self control and direction. People are capable. If conditions are right, youngsters learn to embrace and seek out responsibilities. They are creative, inventive, and imaginative in ways that can be put to use at work. According to these presumptions, a manager's job is to help employees reach their full potential and release it toward group goals (Aithal et al., 2016).
ReplyDelete